<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Richard Campbell Blogs Too - Virtualization</title>
    <link>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/</link>
    <description>Surrendering to the Inevitable</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Richard Campbell</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:33:23 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.7067.0</generator>
    <managingEditor>richard@campbellassociates.ca</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>richard@campbellassociates.ca</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=a3e2d050-47f0-447b-a44a-20ea5b2a1a08</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/PermaLink,guid,a3e2d050-47f0-447b-a44a-20ea5b2a1a08.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/CommentView,guid,a3e2d050-47f0-447b-a44a-20ea5b2a1a08.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=a3e2d050-47f0-447b-a44a-20ea5b2a1a08</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Finally, after two weekends and hours of work, I get to do what I started out trying
to do - building a six drive RAID 5 array out of terabyte hard drives. Cartman's old
5U case was all cleared out, I had all the components, now all I had to do was assemble
the beast. I had a little problem with the <a href="http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/sata_tech/value/SAS-3805">Adaptec
3805 controller</a>. 
</p>
        <p>
The 3805 is actually an SAS controller, using the <a href="http://www.techcable.com/HTML/MINI-SAS.htm">mini-SAS</a> plugs
that handle four drives each. On the web site the specification says that the board
comes with a pair of mini-SAS to SATA cables, but there were no such cables in my
box. Turns out I had ordered the OEM version of the board (the only one available),
and it had no cables in it - which makes sense, its an OEM board, the OEM is always
going to want to do something unique with the board.
</p>
        <p>
Fine, I'll order my own cables. But NOBODY has stock on mini-SAS cables. I flip out
at the supplier, and he calls Adaptec, and they offer to give me a pair of cables
for free (which was mighty nice of them), if I'll pay the shipping. Totally worth
it, I had ordered the wrong product and they were willing to fix it. A FedEx overnight
shipment later, I had cables.
</p>
        <p>
There's so much room in the 5U case that things came together rather quickly. The
motherboard dropped in without a hitch, as did the drive array caddy. Then came the
tricky bit...
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/StorageUpgradeStage3BuildingButters_22F0/IMG_7868_small.jpg" atomicselection="true">
            <img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="350" alt="The drives don't fit!" src="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/StorageUpgradeStage3BuildingButters_22F0/IMG_7868_small_thumb.jpg" width="526" align="left" border="0" />
          </a>Like
Cartman, Butters has a separate pair of mirrored boot drives, although in
this case the drives are 7200rpm SATA II drives, rather than the Ultra-160 SCSI
drives of Cartman.
</p>
        <p>
In the 5U case, the boot drives hang from the card retaining bar... and the first
hitch of the build occurs. In a test hanging (shown to the right), the pair of drives
hit the CPU fans. This is bad.
</p>
        <p>
When a situation like this arises, first you curse. Then the full reality of the situation
hits - all the work you've done for the past few days may have been for naught, this
machine won't fit into this case.
</p>
        <p>
I ran into the <a href="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/PermaLink,guid,32cc0c54-869b-415b-b2a0-531cd40d3eb4.aspx">same
issue</a> with Cartman during his rebuild, I had to modify the cooling blocks to use
lower-profile fans to avoid conflicting with the hanging hard drives. But I didn't have
that option this time... no handy low-profile fans, no alternative cooling blocks.
I needed a different solution.
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/StorageUpgradeStage3BuildingButters_22F0/IMG_7869_small.jpg" atomicselection="true">
            <img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="350" alt="Solution - move the drives." src="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/StorageUpgradeStage3BuildingButters_22F0/IMG_7869_small_thumb.jpg" width="526" align="left" border="0" />
          </a>And
here's the solution - move the drives. It's not like the new machine is full
of cards anyway, it has exactly one, the Adaptec 3805 raid controller. And that card
is low-profile anyway.
</p>
        <p>
So I removed all the card holders from the bar and moved the mounting bracket so that
the drives would hang away from the CPU fans. Problem solved. 
</p>
        <p>
That was really the only hitch in the assembly of Butters, and it only took me a few
minutes to solve it. I like this new drive position better, it puts the drives right
inline with the main fan, so there'll be plenty of cooling air coming over those drives.
</p>
        <p>
 A little more fussing with wiring and I was on my way with a successful boot
of the new motherboard... 
</p>
        <p>
          <a href="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/StorageUpgradeStage3BuildingButters_22F0/IMG_7870_small.jpg" atomicselection="true">
            <img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="350" alt="IMG_7870_small" src="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/StorageUpgradeStage3BuildingButters_22F0/IMG_7870_small_thumb.jpg" width="526" align="left" border="0" />
          </a> Notice
that I plugged one of the 1TB drives into the machine as well, getting ready for the
transfer of all that data back onto a shiny new 5TB array.
</p>
        <p>
Ah, if only it was that easy. First I had to get a server install done. Which you
think would be easy - a brand new motherboard, it should be no problem to get things
up and going with Windows Server 2003, right?
</p>
        <p>
Wrong.
</p>
        <p>
Since I was planning to use this machine to run virtual machines, of course I wanted
a 64 bit operating system on it - there's 16GB of RAM in there, how else would I address
it all?
</p>
        <p>
So I installed Windows Server 2003 SP2 64 bit edition. And the installation went cleanly,
but didn't recognize the pair of built-in gigabit NICs. I wasn't all that surprised,
after all, brand new motherboard, I'd need to install the drivers separately. Now
if only I could find them.
</p>
        <p>
On the Tyan web site you can see all sorts of <a href="http://www.tyan.com/support_download_drivers.aspx?model=S.S2927">drivers
for the S2927</a>, including drivers for Windows 2003 Server 64 bit, so you'd think
there would be NIC drivers there. In fact, under the heading "Driver Packs" there
is a pack for Windows 2003 Server 64 bit which SAYS it has LAN/NIC drivers. However,
if you actually download it, there's no NIC drivers in there. In fact, if you open
up the zip file, the README doc lists everything in the driver pack and it does NOT
include the NIC drivers.
</p>
        <p>
I tried installing it anyway, but to no avail - the NICs were still unrecognized.
</p>
        <p>
However, the Adaptec software worked great AND the 5TB array was able to be built.
But it was going to take more than 24 hours to prep itself, so it was worth tinkering
with other configurations before settling for this.
</p>
        <p>
So I headed over to the nVidia site... perhaps the reference drivers for the nVidia
chipset would handle the NICs better. The chipset on this motherboard is the nVidia
nForce Professional 3600 series. And lo and behold, there ARE <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/nforce_pro3000_winserver2003_x64_9.24.html">reference
drivers</a> for Windows 2003 Server 64 bit. But they TOO could not recognize the NICs.
</p>
        <p>
I even tried the <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us">prerelease
tool</a> on the download page to detect what drivers to use, and it recommended the
Vista drivers! Figuring it couldn't be any worse, I tried them too... and this time
the NICs were recognized, but were not functioning.
</p>
        <p>
So now I'm afraid - afraid that my motherboard is defective. But now that I have nothing
to lose I thought "what the heck, let's try Windows 2008 Server!" I had Release Candidate
0 handy, it was worth a shot.
</p>
        <p>
Windows 2008 Server RC0 is a massive 2.5GB, I had to make a DVD for the install. But
it installed flawlessly and recognized the motherboard, including the NICs. I was
fully operational. And Windows 2008 Server is beautiful... but its a release candidate!
</p>
        <p>
So now my motherboard was working perfectly, I installed the Adaptec RAID controller
software. It installed, recognized the controller AND the drives. For the first time
I had everything working, admittedly on a release candidate. How could I resist? I
configured the 5TB array and let it rip.
</p>
        <p>
The build ran overnight and finished perfectly. I had a 5TB drive array!
</p>
        <p>
I shutdown Butters, closed it up and stuck it in the rack.
</p>
        <p>
Powered it up again, but when it booted, there was no drive array! I rebooted again,
still no array. What was going on? Pulled Butters back out of the rack, opened it
up, booted it again... still no array.
</p>
        <p>
I went into the 3805 BIOS to configure the array and it didn't show up until I selected
"Refresh Array." Then it showed the complete array, in perfect condition!
</p>
        <p>
Baffled, I exited the BIOS settings which caused a reboot... and the array vanished
again. This time when I finished booting into Windows, I opened up the Adaptec configuration
manager... it showed a failed controller and failed drivers. I selected "Refresh Array",
and it still showed as everything failed - but Windows suddenly found the array! The
drive letter popped up and everything acted fine.
</p>
        <p>
Oddly enough, I was a bit suspicious.
</p>
        <p>
So I started loading data onto the array. I wasn't going to erase any backups, so
I waited for it to fail.
</p>
        <p>
Loading went much faster than backing up, since the drive was plugged directly into
the machine. Within a few hours, I had everything reloaded.
</p>
        <p>
I was still suspicious.
</p>
        <p>
I configured the file shares and got both the music and television archives up and
running. They worked perfectly.
</p>
        <p>
Now I really had a problem - I was running a release candidate OS, the configuration
software says the array has failed (although the BIOS says its fine, once you refresh),
but Windows itself is perfectly happy with it. And my family was happy to have the
music and video back online. I couldn't very well take it back down. As long as it
didn't reboot, the array seemed to stay up. Scary.
</p>
        <p>
I sent a tech support request to Tyan, hopefully they'll have something useful to
say. I really ought to go back to Windows 2003 Server 64 bit, but only if I can get
the NICs to work.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=a3e2d050-47f0-447b-a44a-20ea5b2a1a08" />
      </body>
      <title>Storage Upgrade Stage 3 - Building Butters</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/PermaLink,guid,a3e2d050-47f0-447b-a44a-20ea5b2a1a08.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/PermaLink,guid,a3e2d050-47f0-447b-a44a-20ea5b2a1a08.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:33:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Finally, after two weekends and hours of work, I get to do what I started out trying
to do - building a six drive RAID 5 array out of terabyte hard drives. Cartman's old
5U case was all cleared out, I had all the components, now all I had to do was assemble
the beast. I had a little problem with the &lt;a href="http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/sata_tech/value/SAS-3805"&gt;Adaptec
3805 controller&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The 3805 is&amp;nbsp;actually an SAS controller, using the &lt;a href="http://www.techcable.com/HTML/MINI-SAS.htm"&gt;mini-SAS&lt;/a&gt; plugs
that handle four drives each. On the web site the specification says that the board
comes with a pair of mini-SAS to SATA cables, but there were no such cables in my
box. Turns out I had ordered the OEM version of the board (the only one available),
and it had no cables in it - which makes sense, its an OEM board, the OEM is always
going to want to do something unique with the board.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Fine, I'll order my own cables. But NOBODY has stock on mini-SAS cables. I flip out
at the supplier, and he calls Adaptec, and they offer to give me a pair of cables
for free (which was mighty nice of them), if I'll pay the shipping. Totally worth
it, I had ordered the wrong product and they were willing to fix it. A FedEx overnight
shipment later, I had cables.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There's so much room in the 5U case that things came together rather quickly. The
motherboard dropped in without a hitch, as did the drive array caddy. Then came the
tricky bit...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/StorageUpgradeStage3BuildingButters_22F0/IMG_7868_small.jpg" atomicselection="true"&gt;&lt;img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="350" alt="The drives don't fit!" src="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/StorageUpgradeStage3BuildingButters_22F0/IMG_7868_small_thumb.jpg" width="526" align="left" border="0"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Like
Cartman,&amp;nbsp;Butters has a separate pair of&amp;nbsp;mirrored boot drives, although in
this case the drives are&amp;nbsp;7200rpm SATA II drives, rather than the Ultra-160 SCSI
drives of Cartman.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the 5U case, the boot drives hang from the card retaining bar... and the first
hitch of the build occurs. In a test hanging (shown to the right), the pair of drives
hit the&amp;nbsp;CPU fans. This is bad.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
When a situation like this arises, first you curse. Then the full reality of the situation
hits - all the work you've done for the past few days may have been for naught, this
machine won't fit into this case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I ran into the &lt;a href="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/PermaLink,guid,32cc0c54-869b-415b-b2a0-531cd40d3eb4.aspx"&gt;same
issue&lt;/a&gt; with Cartman during his rebuild, I had to modify the cooling blocks to use
lower-profile fans to avoid conflicting with the hanging&amp;nbsp;hard drives. But I didn't&amp;nbsp;have
that option this time... no handy low-profile fans, no alternative cooling blocks.
I needed a different solution.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/StorageUpgradeStage3BuildingButters_22F0/IMG_7869_small.jpg" atomicselection="true"&gt;&lt;img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="350" alt="Solution - move the drives." src="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/StorageUpgradeStage3BuildingButters_22F0/IMG_7869_small_thumb.jpg" width="526" align="left" border="0"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;And
here's the solution - move the drives. It's not like the&amp;nbsp;new machine is full
of cards anyway, it has exactly one, the Adaptec 3805 raid controller. And that card
is low-profile anyway.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So I removed all the card holders from the bar and moved the mounting bracket so that
the drives would hang away from the CPU fans. Problem solved.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
That was really the only hitch in the assembly of Butters, and it only took me a few
minutes to solve it. I like this new drive position better, it puts the drives right
inline with the main fan, so there'll be plenty of cooling air coming over those drives.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;A little more fussing with wiring and I was on my way with a successful boot
of the new motherboard... 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/StorageUpgradeStage3BuildingButters_22F0/IMG_7870_small.jpg" atomicselection="true"&gt;&lt;img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="350" alt="IMG_7870_small" src="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/StorageUpgradeStage3BuildingButters_22F0/IMG_7870_small_thumb.jpg" width="526" align="left" border="0"&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Notice
that I plugged one of the 1TB drives into the machine as well, getting ready for the
transfer of all that data back onto a shiny new 5TB array.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Ah, if only it was that easy. First I had to get a server install done. Which you
think would be easy - a brand new motherboard, it should be no problem to get things
up and going with Windows Server 2003, right?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Wrong.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Since I was planning to use this machine to run virtual machines, of course I wanted
a 64 bit operating system on it - there's 16GB of RAM in there, how else would I address
it all?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So I installed Windows Server 2003 SP2 64 bit edition. And the installation went cleanly,
but didn't recognize the pair of built-in gigabit NICs. I wasn't all that surprised,
after all, brand new motherboard, I'd need to install the drivers separately. Now
if only I could find them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On the Tyan web site you can see all sorts of &lt;a href="http://www.tyan.com/support_download_drivers.aspx?model=S.S2927"&gt;drivers
for the S2927&lt;/a&gt;, including drivers for Windows 2003 Server 64 bit, so you'd think
there would be NIC drivers there. In fact, under the heading "Driver Packs" there
is a pack for Windows 2003 Server 64 bit which SAYS it has LAN/NIC drivers. However,
if you actually download it, there's no NIC drivers in there. In fact, if you open
up the zip file, the README doc lists everything in the driver pack and it does NOT
include the NIC drivers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I tried installing it anyway, but to no avail - the NICs were still unrecognized.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
However, the Adaptec software worked great AND the 5TB array was able to be built.
But it was going to take more than 24 hours to prep itself, so it was worth tinkering
with other configurations before settling for this.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So I headed over to the nVidia site... perhaps the reference drivers for the nVidia
chipset would handle the NICs better. The chipset on this motherboard is the nVidia
nForce Professional 3600 series. And lo and behold, there ARE &lt;a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/nforce_pro3000_winserver2003_x64_9.24.html"&gt;reference
drivers&lt;/a&gt; for Windows 2003 Server 64 bit. But they TOO could not recognize the NICs.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I even tried the &lt;a href="http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us"&gt;prerelease
tool&lt;/a&gt; on the download page to detect what drivers to use, and it recommended the
Vista drivers! Figuring it couldn't be any worse, I tried them too... and this time
the NICs were recognized, but were not functioning.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So now I'm afraid - afraid that my motherboard is defective. But now that I have nothing
to lose I thought "what the heck, let's try Windows 2008 Server!" I had Release Candidate
0 handy, it was worth a shot.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Windows 2008 Server RC0 is a massive 2.5GB, I had to make a DVD for the install. But
it installed flawlessly and recognized the motherboard, including the NICs. I was
fully operational. And Windows 2008 Server is beautiful... but its a release candidate!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So now my motherboard was working perfectly, I installed the Adaptec RAID controller
software. It installed, recognized the controller AND the drives. For the first time
I had everything working, admittedly on a release candidate. How could I resist? I
configured the 5TB array and let it rip.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The build ran overnight and finished perfectly. I had a 5TB drive array!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I shutdown Butters, closed it up and stuck it in the rack.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Powered it up again, but when it booted, there was no drive array! I rebooted again,
still no array. What was going on? Pulled Butters back out of the rack, opened it
up, booted it again... still no array.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I went into the 3805 BIOS to configure the array and it didn't show up until I selected
"Refresh Array." Then it showed the complete array, in perfect condition!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Baffled, I exited the BIOS settings which caused a reboot... and the array vanished
again. This time when I finished booting into Windows, I opened up the Adaptec configuration
manager... it showed a failed controller and failed drivers. I selected "Refresh Array",
and it still showed as everything failed - but Windows suddenly found the array! The
drive letter popped up and everything acted fine.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Oddly enough, I was a bit suspicious.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So I started loading data onto the array. I wasn't going to erase any backups, so
I waited for it to fail.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Loading went much faster than backing up, since the drive was plugged directly into
the machine. Within a few hours, I had everything reloaded.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I was still suspicious.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I configured the file shares and got both the music and television archives up and
running. They worked perfectly.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Now I really had a problem - I was running a release candidate OS, the configuration
software says the array has failed (although the BIOS says its fine, once you refresh),
but Windows itself is perfectly happy with it. And my family was happy to have the
music and video back online. I couldn't very well take it back down. As long as it
didn't reboot, the array seemed to stay up. Scary.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I sent a tech support request to Tyan, hopefully they'll have something useful to
say. I really ought to go back to Windows 2003 Server 64 bit, but only if I can get
the NICs to work.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=a3e2d050-47f0-447b-a44a-20ea5b2a1a08" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/CommentView,guid,a3e2d050-47f0-447b-a44a-20ea5b2a1a08.aspx</comments>
      <category>Rackmounting</category>
      <category>Toys</category>
      <category>Virtualization</category>
      <category>Windows Server 2008</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=6f9aaa49-5fbf-4772-a0ee-71691b91205a</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/PermaLink,guid,6f9aaa49-5fbf-4772-a0ee-71691b91205a.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/CommentView,guid,6f9aaa49-5fbf-4772-a0ee-71691b91205a.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=6f9aaa49-5fbf-4772-a0ee-71691b91205a</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
After having a couple of laughs around whether we were talking about Virtualization
for Disaster Recovery or <a href="http://www.runasradio.com/default.aspx?showNum=19">Disaster
Recovery for Virtualization</a> (it was the latter), Greg and I went deep with
Bob Roudebush into the issues of doing backups of guest VMs and host environments
using <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/">Microsoft
Virtual Server</a> and <a href="http://www.vmware.com/">VMWare</a>.
</p>
        <p>
We keep coming back to virtualization as a key topic for today's IT personnel. Let
us know if this is what you'd like to hear at <a href="mailto:info@runasradio.com">info@runasradio.com</a>.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=6f9aaa49-5fbf-4772-a0ee-71691b91205a" />
      </body>
      <title>RunAs Radio #19: Bob Roudebush on Disaster Recovery for Virtualization!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/PermaLink,guid,6f9aaa49-5fbf-4772-a0ee-71691b91205a.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/PermaLink,guid,6f9aaa49-5fbf-4772-a0ee-71691b91205a.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:02:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
After having a couple of laughs around whether we were talking about Virtualization
for Disaster Recovery or &lt;a href="http://www.runasradio.com/default.aspx?showNum=19"&gt;Disaster
Recovery for Virtualization&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(it was the latter), Greg and I went deep with
Bob Roudebush into the issues of doing backups of guest VMs and host environments
using &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/"&gt;Microsoft
Virtual Server&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.vmware.com/"&gt;VMWare&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We keep coming back to virtualization as a key topic for today's IT personnel. Let
us know if this is what you'd like to hear at &lt;a href="mailto:info@runasradio.com"&gt;info@runasradio.com&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=6f9aaa49-5fbf-4772-a0ee-71691b91205a" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.campbellassociates.ca/blog/CommentView,guid,6f9aaa49-5fbf-4772-a0ee-71691b91205a.aspx</comments>
      <category>PodCasting</category>
      <category>RunAs Radio</category>
      <category>Virtualization</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>